Corporate welfare booming

San Francisco's business tax breaks reach $14.2 million for 2012, up from $4.2 million in 2011

|
(8)

rebecca@sfbg.com

Business tax breaks instituted by San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee and other corporate-friendly local politicians to stimulate growth in tech, biotech, and cleantech, diverted roughly $14.2 million from city coffers in 2012, records show. That's a staggering increase from 2011, when the city's corporate welfare programs amounted to roughly $4.2 million.

The beneficiaries, mostly representing sectors that are enjoying supercharged growth buoyed by venture capital at a time when much of the economy is still foundering in the wake of the Great Recession, qualified for the tax breaks in exchange for doing business in San Francisco or setting up shop in the Central Market/Tenderloin area.

When the latest spate of business tax cuts was launched in early 2011 to keep Twitter here and stimulate economic growth around its headquarters on mid-Market Street, critics took aim at Lee for sapping city resources with needless corporate giveaways. A 2012 New York Times analysis showed that the $22 million Twitter is expected to save over the six-year tax break makes it the largest incentive granted to a company in California, based on data going at least as far back as 2002.

The various payroll-tax exclusions — they're available for green technology and biotech firms, as well as companies operating in designated "enterprise" zones — waive a 1.5 percent tax on employee compensation expenses. Collectively, the forgone revenues from 2012 reflect taxes not collected on more than $680 million in employee compensation.

With more businesses than ever lining up to take advantage of the handouts, and two additional tax-breaks enacted since 2011, the amount given away has surged. The Treasurer & Tax Collector's Office submitted the final figures in annual reports to the Board of Supervisors on Sept. 13.

The giveaways included $3.3 million for two companies claiming exclusions for stock-based compensation. In 2011, only Zynga qualified for this stock-based exclusion program, saving $1.5 million in taxes. In 2012, a second company qualified for this break, more than doubling the amount given away as the value of Zynga's tax break soared.

A Central Market / Tenderloin payroll tax exclusion program waived payroll taxes for 14 businesses operating last year in that neighborhood — a long-impoverished area where tech and venture capital firms have been snapping up commercial office space. While the Central Market tax exclusion resulted in corporate giveaways totaling just $34,000 in 2011, the incentive resulted in about $1.9 million in forgone revenues in 2012.

Meanwhile, about $5.4 million stemmed from programs that didn't specifically benefit tech firms or mid-Market transplants. There was a payroll-tax exemption crafted to aid small business, and a surplus business tax credit, which distributed $500 to each of the 6,781 businesses that paid the payroll tax.

Speaking onstage at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference on Sept. 9, Mayor Lee touted the tech sector's soaring job growth, using an info-graphic to spotlight the city's 1,892 tech companies and 45,493 jobs that were recently added.

The eye-popping statistics prompted conference host Michael Arrington to query Lee on what is being done for San Franciscans who are finding it increasingly unaffordable to remain in the city. The mayor, who was sitting beside billionaire tech investor Ron Conway, acknowledged that Arrington had "a good point," and referenced an affordable housing trust fund approved by voters last year.

But at the end of the day, despite the growing imbalance, the current economic climate appears to be the exact effect Lee's administration had hoped for when it created these corporate welfare programs.

Ilan Moscowitz contributed to this report.

Comments

Ed Lee was simply doing what he promised he would do when he won his landslide election victory - put jobs and growth first.

Posted by Guest on Sep. 18, 2013 @ 12:13 pm

It's not corporate welfare when the jobs have to be created in order for the benefits to accrue. Those are called performance-based tax incentives. It's too bad the bias and ignorance of the democratic majority write for all the news organizations in this city.

Have you ever heard of economic development? The city may forgo a small amount of business tax revenue on the front end, but the jobs created have an exponential economic impact. Please do your research next time instead of acting like SF is giving away the house.

Posted by Guest on Sep. 18, 2013 @ 12:51 pm

They think that growth just makes the rich richer and pushes up rents so that the poor huddled masses cannot stay here. SFBG hates anything that might have some benefit for the rich, even if it also means middle-class jobs.

If something doesn't help the poor or city workers, then SFBG opposes it.

And yes, I agree it's as mindless as it is evil.

Posted by Guest on Sep. 18, 2013 @ 1:19 pm

One thing that would really help us understand the problem is if someone at the SFBG could explain how they would have kept Twitter in San Francisco without the deal that Lee made.

We know that Twitter had to, and did, move to larger and better offices.

They are planning a huge IPO and San Francisco is the only jurisdiction in the state that taxes IPO options.

We know that Twitter was very close to moving to Brisbane, a short shuttle ride away geographically but completely outside of San Francisco's taxing jurisdiction.

So could someone at the SFBG could explain how Twitter could have been convinced to tell its investors and employees that it was staying in San Francisco, given the city's existing tax programs?

Or maybe you should just put up the Troll Barrier and avoid anwsering.

Posted by Guest on Sep. 18, 2013 @ 1:12 pm

Their bizarre reasoning is that if more successful businesses and wealthy people leave SF, then SF will remain poorer and cheaper, meaning that bad artists and illegals and under-employed and under-educated slackers and losers can more easily afford to live here.

SFBG wants SF to be more like Detroit so that any half-assed dreamer or misfit who wants to live here can do so, even to the point where the whole economy is shot and, like Detroit, we go bankrupt.

SFBG hates business, hates successful people and supports only failure and poverty.

Posted by Guest on Sep. 19, 2013 @ 1:45 pm

this is simply a twoll barrier

it is a signpost to indicate to the reader that other anonymous posters on this thread are beginning to provide arguments that cannot be refused by progressives, forcing said progressives into petty, mean spirited, personal attacks and irrelevant bickering, in order to change the subject

the barrier is put in place to signal that your most cherished progressive beliefs are at risk if you read the post above this twoll barrier

please forget that you ever read the preceding post

/fnord

Posted by Twoll Barrier on Sep. 19, 2013 @ 3:01 pm

SFBG had no viable, plausible plan for retaining Twitter. They would have just let them leave, and Mid-Market would still be wall-to-wall hookers and dealers in that case.

SFBG hates the successful so much that they would rather lose hundreds of good jobs for SF'ers than give a penny to one person who is more successful than they are, and erode the taxbase at the same time.

Valid points.

Posted by Guest on Sep. 19, 2013 @ 3:13 pm

It's Lilli with a lisp.

Posted by anon on Sep. 19, 2013 @ 3:19 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.