All together now - Page 3

It takes a village — and a Google Doc — to legalize pot: California's Marijuana Control, Legalization and Revenue Act of 2014, a new crowd-sourced legislation proposal

|
(2)

As the final, amended version of the MCLR initiative undergoes evaluation by the office of the Secretary of State, the greatest obstacle now facing AFPR is the task of raising the $2 million needed to gather signatures for the petition. Without that funding, the measure won't appear on the 2014 ballot, regardless of all the effort and collaboration already invested. The organization has been cultivating relationships with prospective sponsors, but collecting that large of a sum will not be easy.

Still, the initiative's proponents remain confident. According to the most recent survey data released by AFPR, 64 percent of California voters want to legalize marijuana in 2014. This support follows a broader trend: Results of a recent Gallup poll show that for the first time since Americans were first polled on their attitudes toward marijuana in 1969, a clear majority of Americans — 58 percent — say it should be legalized.

"The time is now," declared John Lee, another proponent. "The voters are ready, and we can get it done."

What getting it done will ultimately mean, in practice, is anyone's guess.

"We're talking about a lot of saved money as far as people going to jail, better use of resources, and a new stream of revenue for the state," Hodges predicts. "There's obviously gonna be some sort of liquor-store type models. But I've heard of everything from marijuana-friendly bed and breakfasts, to high-end bars that will have girls going around like cigarette girls used to, but with different types of pre-rolled joints."

Taking it all in, he concluded, "The possibilities are pretty endless. But if this initiative passes, we will set a standard for the rest of the country."

 

Comments

I'm as right wing as they come on economic issues.

But I see little utility in punishing people for getting high.

See how liberal i am? I don't even object to gay marriage.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 10, 2013 @ 6:40 pm

Decriminalisation, accompanied by sensible, enforceable regulations to ensure patient/consumer safety and environmental protection is the only true answer to this 'situation'. Unfortunately "Legislation" is probably inevitable. However it is merely opening the door to a continued monopoly by BigPharma; corporate cannabis profiteers; avaricious middle-men; assorted hucksters and pot prohibition pimps; opportunistic politicos and lawyers; and even more Federal intrusion into our lives. We can already see what the 'free market' cannabis industry will look like. In Canada laws have already been enacted prohibiting individuals from growing their own. Another example can be found in Washington State where the following link shows how their 'free market' will be controlled.
www.leafscience.com/2013/11/07/washingtons-seed-sale-system-explained-in...
At least they're not requiring autopsies and certificates of disposal of dead flowers, yet.
'Legalisation' is a front for those with vested financial interests and preserving their power by increased 'police' controls. The contention that a plant can be illegal is preposterous, especially one with such enormous medical and economic potential, it is a continuation of the war on drugs and restriction of individual rights and liberties.
If dogs run free, why not weed, across the fruitful plains.
Just my 2c.

Posted by Patrick Monk.RN. on Dec. 12, 2013 @ 11:26 am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.